Home / Insights / Permitting & Land Use
Permitting & Land Use
The dominant theme across LA County cities is comprehensive zoning reform driven by both local planning initiatives and accelerating state housing mandates. Long Beach is executing the most ambitious package in this period — coordinated first and second readings rezoning Lime Avenue from residential to mixed-use, restructuring the Greater Bixby Knolls corridor, and creating new Mixed-Use and Commercial Main Street zoning districts, each paired with a general plan amendment and CEQA environmental addendum. Culver City adopted the Fox Hills Specific Plan with accompanying zoning changes, and both Pomona and Calabasas adopted objective design standards for multi-family and mixed-use development, reflecting a countywide push to formalize development standards ahead of anticipated project volume.
State housing law — particularly SB 79 (Abundant and Affordable Homes) and the Density Bonus — is a newly emergent pressure point reshaping local agendas. Culver City opened a public hearing to implement SB 79 in May 2026; Glendale responded by introducing an ordinance to delay those requirements specifically in fire zones. Long Beach is separately updating its Enhanced Density Bonus program, including an inclusionary housing code amendment. ABC liquor license reviews and public convenience or necessity (PCN) findings recur consistently across Long Beach, Los Angeles, and Pomona, with Los Angeles handling the broadest spread — PCN hearings for Whole Foods, a painting studio, and a beer retailer — while Pomona resolved two Type-21 off-sale license applications at convenience markets. Cannabis regulation continues as an ongoing LA-specific thread, with items covering social equity ownership transfer rules, cultivation licensing, and code renewal processes.
Explicit dollar amounts are modest relative to the volume of activity. Redondo Beach holds the largest stated figure: a $1,000,000 plan check and inspection staffing contract with Melad and Associates (adding $500,000 to an existing agreement), alongside a $35,000 marina parking study. Long Beach transacted two surplus property sales totaling $48,500 (3001 Atlantic Avenue at $37,500 and an 11th Street/Belmont Avenue parcel at $11,000). Signal Hill is completing a disposition and development agreement for its city-owned Heritage Square property. Most permitting and land use activity across the county is process- and staff-intensive rather than dollar-significant in the items presented.
(Synthesized from the 120 most recent items.)
What to watch AI-generated
Key items (8)
- [31] Adopt ordinance for a city-initiated Zoning Map Change (ZCHG24-006), and adopt the proposed findings related thereto, to amend the zoning designation for a property at 5705-5723 Lime Avenue (APN 7127-006-917) from Low-Density Multi-family Residential, Small Lot (R-3-S) to Mixed Use 2, Special Use Incentives (MU-2-A), read the first time and laid over to the next regular meeting of the City Council for final reading. (District 8) — Long Beach, 2026-06-09 · First reading rezoning Lime Avenue from residential to mixed-use — the anchor ordinance in Long Beach's coordinated multi-corridor rezoning package, paired with a general plan height increase and CEQA addendum.
- [52] Recommendation to declare ordinance adopting Zoning Code Amendment (ZCA26-001), adopting the proposed findings related thereto, to amend Chapters 21.15, 21.21 and 21.68 of the Long Beach Municipal Code (Zoning Regulations) to update the existing Enhanced Density Bonus to align with the provisions of the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance; add special bonuses for projects providing community benefits; and implement other procedural and implementation streamlining changes, read and adopted as read. — Long Beach, 2026-06-16 · Enhanced Density Bonus zoning code amendment with inclusionary housing provisions, illustrating Long Beach's state-mandate compliance strategy heading into second reading June 16.
- [53] Recommendation to adopt ordinance amending Title 22.11, 22.12, 22.15, 22.30, 22.40, and 22.41 of the Long Beach Municipal Code (ZCA24-005) to establish two new zoning districts, Mixed-Use Main Street (MU-M) and Commercial Main Street (C-M) that will implement the Neighborhood Serving Corridor Low (NSC-L) and Community Commercial (CC) PlaceTypes of the Long Beach General Plan Land Use Element and minor amendments to all existing zoning districts contained within Title 22, read and adopted as read. — Long Beach, 2026-06-16 · Adoption of new Mixed-Use and Commercial Main Street zoning districts — a structural addition to Long Beach's zoning framework completing the corridor reform package.
- [26-767] CC - PUBLIC HEARING: Introduction of an Ordinance Approving City-Initiated Zoning Code Amendment P2025-0066-ZCA to Amend the Culver City Municipal Code (CCMC) to Implement California State Senate Bill 79, the Abundant and Affordable Homes Near Transit Act. — Culver City, 2026-05-11 · SB 79 implementation public hearing, the clearest example of state housing law arriving as a direct forcing function on local zoning agendas in this period.
- [10.a.1] Intro. of Ordinance to Delay Effectuation of Senate Bill 79 ("The Abundant and Affordable Homes Near Transit Act") for Certain Sites Located Within the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone and/or Containing a Locally Designated Historic Resource. — Glendale, 2026-06-09 · Ordinance delaying SB 79 requirements in fire zones — the sharpest local pushback against the same state mandate, illustrating divergent city responses to identical state pressure.
- [6] Adoption of Ordinance No. 2026-424 - Objective Design Standards (ODS) for Multi-Family and Mixed-Use Projects — Calabasas, 2026-05-27 · Adoption of objective design standards for multi-family and mixed-use, part of a countywide pattern (also in Pomona) where cities are codifying design rules in anticipation of by-right housing development.
- [26-0592] APPROVE THE THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT WITH MELAD AND ASSOCIATES, INC. TO PROVIDE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CHECK SERVICES AND INSPECTION AND PERMIT TECHNICIAN STAFFING SUPPORT AS NEEDED, ADDING $500,000 TO THE AGREEMENT, FOR A NEW NOT TO EXCEED TOTAL OF $1,000,000 FULLY OFFSET BY FEES APPROVE THE SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT WITH BOWMAN INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERS LTD. TO PROVIDE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CHECK SERVICES AND INSPECTION AND PERMIT TECHNICIAN STAFFING SUPPORT AS NEEDED, ADDING $500,000 TO THE AGREEMENT, FOR A NEW NOT TO EXCEED TOTAL OF $970,000 FULLY OFFSET BY FEES APPROVE THE SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT WITH TRANSTECH ENGINEERS, INC TO PROVIDE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CHECK SERVICES AND INSPECTION AND PERMIT TECHNICIAN STAFFING SUPPORT AS NEEDED, ADDING $500,000 TO THE AGREEMENT, FOR A NEW NOT TO EXCEED TOTAL OF $700,000 FULLY OFFSET BY FEES APPROVE AN AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT WITH TRUE NORTH COMPLIANCE SERVICES, INC. TO PROVIDE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CHECK SERVICES AN — Redondo Beach, 2026-05-12 · Largest explicit spending figure in the dataset — $1,000,000 plan check and inspection staffing contract — showing a city investing in permitting capacity rather than reform.
- [26-1563] HERITAGE SQUARE DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT — Signal Hill, 2026-06-09 · Heritage Square disposition and development agreement, illustrating how smaller cities are converting city-owned land into development opportunities through negotiated agreements.
- Coverage is 10 of LA County's 88 cities today, expanding across the county — not yet a full regional census.
- We compare shares of council attention (% of substantive items), not raw counts, so a small city and a large one compare fairly. Procedural boilerplate (minutes, warrants, proclamations, appointments, presentations) is stripped first.
- Dollars are $ on items naming an amount, deduped to one figure per item — not verified award totals. "—" means no amount was extracted, never that $0 was spent.
- The ingested window differs by city, so totals aren't over identical periods.
How cities compare on permitting & land use
Share of each city's council attention going to this topic (substantive items), and dollars per resident where amounts were extracted. We don't rank by raw counts.
| City | Attention share | $ (items) | $ / resident |
|---|---|---|---|
| Signal Hill |
11% |
— | — |
| Long Beach |
11% |
$10.7M | $22.98 |
| Culver City |
10% |
— | — |
| Claremont |
9% |
— | — |
| Redondo Beach |
9% |
$1.0M | $14.46 |
| Glendale |
8% |
$300K | $1.53 |
| Calabasas |
8% |
— | — |
| Los Angeles |
7% |
— | — |
| Pomona |
6% |
— | — |
| Sierra Madre |
4% |
— | — |
Named decisions on this topic
Biggest dollars
Contested votes
Vote records are partial — captured only where a city publishes minutes or an official council journal (chiefly Long Beach and Los Angeles); this is not a cross-city contestedness comparison.
Flagged for review (5)
Recovered from PDF/scanned sources; titles not fully verified. Shown for transparency.
Cross-city precedents
Similar permitting & land use actions appearing in more than one city — starting points to investigate.
Annual Budget Study Sessions — Glendale, Sierra Madre, Signal Hill
Glendale, Sierra Madre, and Signal Hill are each holding multi-department budget study sessions, reviewing proposed spending across city departments and capital projects as part of their annual budget process. AI summary
General Plan Annual Progress Reports — Calabasas, Glendale, Signal Hill
Calabasas, Glendale, and Signal Hill are each reviewing their annual General Plan progress reports, a standard requirement for California cities to track how well local development and land-use decisions align with their long-term planning goals. AI summary
Objective Design Standards for Multi-Family Housing — Calabasas, Glendale
Calabasas and Glendale are both adopting objective design standards for multi-family residential and mixed-use development, establishing clear, measurable criteria to guide the appearance and layout of new housing projects. AI summary