Home / Insights / Homelessness
Homelessness
Across six LA County cities — Long Beach, Glendale, Pomona, Redondo Beach, Culver City, and Signal Hill — agenda activity from late 2025 through mid-2026 clusters around four main themes: federally-funded housing grants (CDBG, ESG, HOME), shelter and interim housing operations, camping and public-space regulation, and prevention/outreach services. Long Beach maintains the broadest portfolio by far, with contracts spanning year-round shelters, Project Homekey site operations, a youth navigation center, mobile outreach partnership with Cal State Long Beach, and a commissioned strategic plan update. Smaller cities focus more narrowly: Redondo Beach on targeted prevention grants and legislative advocacy, Signal Hill on coordination and staff recognition, and Claremont on an annual update presentation.
Dollar magnitudes vary sharply by city. Long Beach dominates: a $9.6M award to 1736 Family Crisis Center, Catholic Charities, and Goodwill for shelter services (May 2026); PATH contracts totaling roughly $18M for year-round shelter and Project Homekey site operations (March 2026); $1.2M for interim housing (February 2026); and $743K for homeless prevention (April 2026) — placing Long Beach's identifiable homeless-related commitments in this period well above $25M. Glendale's FY 2026-27 HUD Annual Action Plan totals $3.21M (approved jointly by City Council and Housing Authority). Pomona committed $2.2M to prefabricated modular units for permanent supportive housing. Redondo Beach's allocations are smaller in scale: $150,706 for a housing navigator and shelter operations, and a $6,000 HERO Community Services grant expansion. Signal Hill's measurable fiscal footprint in this area is limited to staff coordination.
A meaningful divergence is emerging between cities taking a regulatory approach and those investing in service capacity. Pomona introduced camping and public-property-storage ordinances in both April and May 2026, alongside an ordinance waiving procurement requirements to accelerate homeless projects — signaling urgency on enforcement and housing supply simultaneously. Long Beach is investing in strategic planning and academic partnerships, while Culver City presented on the Safe Parking LA program and Homekey as alternative intervention models. Redondo Beach stands apart by formally opposing the county's proposed homelessness governance restructuring (May 2026) and taking explicit positions on state legislation (AB 2741 supported, SB 866 opposed), positioning itself as an active critic of regional oversight rather than a passive recipient of county direction.
What to watch AI-generated
Key items (8)
- [30] Recommendation to adopt Specifications No. RFP HSB-2026-002 and award contracts to 1736 Family Crisis Center, of Los Angeles, CA; Catholic Charities of Los Angeles, Inc.; Goodwill, Southern Los Angele — Long Beach, 2026-05-12 · Largest single service contract in the dataset ($9.6M to three nonprofits), anchoring Long Beach's core shelter network and illustrating the scale gap between Long Beach and other cities
- [2b] City Council Motion to approve FY 2026-27 CDBG, ESG, and HOME Annual Action Plan totaling $3,210,581; authorize the submission of the Annual Action Plan to U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), as recommended by the CDBG Advisory Committee and Continuum of Care (CoC) Board; and authorize the City Manager or a designee, to redirect excess, cancelled or unused program funds under $50,000 from one project to another with CDBG Advisory Committee approval — Glendale, 2026-06-02 · Sets Glendale's full federal grant allocation (CDBG/ESG/HOME) for FY 2026-27 at $3.21M, the primary federal funding vehicle for the city's homeless and housing programs
- [26-1104] Approve a Sole Source Purchase with LifeArk SPC in the Amount of $2,245,001 for the Acquisition of Prefabricated Modular Housing Units for the Development of Permanent Supportive Housing It is recommended that the City Council approve a sole-source purchase with LifeArk SPC in the amount of $2,245,001 for the acquisition of prefabricated modular housing units for the development of permanent supportive housing. — Pomona, 2026-03-16 · $2.2M capital commitment to prefabricated modular units represents the only significant permanent supportive housing infrastructure investment in the dataset outside of Long Beach's Homekey
- [26-1339] Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance Relating to Camping and Storing Personal Property on Public Property It is recommended that the City Council adopt the following ordinance: ORDINANCE NO. 4369 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF POMONA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 46 (“STREETS, SIDEWALKS AND OTHER PUBLIC PLACES”), ARTICLE XII (“CAMPING, SLEEPING OR STORAGE OF PROPERTY”), SECTIONS 46-601 - 46-606 OF THE POMONA CITY CODE AND ADDING SECTIONS 46-607 - 46-611 RELATING TO CAMPING AND STORING PERSONAL PROPERTY ON PUBLIC PROPERTY — Pomona, 2026-05-04 · Most recent in a two-ordinance series (April and May 2026) on camping and public property storage, exemplifying the enforcement-side legislative trend appearing across multiple cities
- [23] Recommendation to adopt specifications No. RFP HE-24-500 and award contracts to First to Serve, of Los Angeles, CA, for the operation and supportive services of the Year Round Shelter Programs, in a total aggregate amount not to exceed $6,315,960, from October 1, 2025, through March 31, 2026, at the discretion of the City Manager; and, authorize City Manager, or designee, to execute all necessary documents to enter into the contracts, including any necessary amendments. — Long Beach, 2026-03-10 · $6.3M year-round shelter operations contract establishes Long Beach's baseline shelter infrastructure and shows the recurring, multi-contract nature of its homeless services funding
- [26-0608] AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO SIGN A LETTER TO THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS TO OPPOSE A BOARD MOTION REGARDING A MORE ACCOUNTABLE HOMELESSNESS GOVERNANCE STRUCTURE FOR LOS ANGELES COUNTY INTRODUCED BY SUPERVISOR LINDSEY HORVATH — Redondo Beach, 2026-05-12 · Formal opposition to county homelessness governance restructuring is the clearest signal of city-county governance tension in the dataset and has direct policy implications for regional coordination
- [15] Recommendation to adopt Specifications No. RFP HSB-2026-001 and award a contract to Jovenes, Inc., of Los Angeles, CA, for providing Interim Housing operations and support services for the Transitional Age Youth Navigation Center, in a total annual amount not to exceed $565,020, for a period of one year beginning April 1, 2026, with the option to renew for two additional one-year periods, at the discretion of the City Manager; and authorize City Manager, or designee, to execute all documents necessary to enter into the contract, including any necessary subsequent amendments. (Citywide) — Long Beach, 2026-04-14 · $565K youth navigation center contract highlights transitional-age youth as a distinct emerging sub-population receiving dedicated interim housing investment
- [26-377] CC - A Presentation to City Council Regarding the "Safe Parking LA" Program and Services. — Culver City, 2026-02-23 · Safe Parking LA presentation illustrates an alternative intervention model — vehicle residency services — that differs substantively from the shelter-and-housing focus dominant in other cities' agendas
- Coverage is 9 of LA County's 88 cities today, expanding across the county — not yet a full regional census.
- We compare shares of council attention (% of substantive items), not raw counts, so a small city and a large one compare fairly. Procedural boilerplate (minutes, warrants, proclamations, appointments, presentations) is stripped first.
- Dollars are $ on items naming an amount, deduped to one figure per item — not verified award totals. "—" means no amount was extracted, never that $0 was spent.
- The ingested window differs by city, so totals aren't over identical periods.
How cities compare on homelessness
Share of each city's council attention going to this topic (substantive items), and dollars per resident where amounts were extracted. We don't rank by raw counts.
| City | Attention share | $ (items) | $ / resident |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pomona |
4% |
$2.2M | $14.80 |
| Long Beach |
3% |
$48.7M | $104.42 |
| Signal Hill |
1% |
— | — |
| Glendale |
1% |
$6.4M | $32.67 |
| Redondo Beach |
1% |
$157K | $2.19 |
| Culver City |
0% |
— | — |
| Calabasas |
0% |
— | — |
| Claremont |
0% |
— | — |
| Sierra Madre |
0% |
— | — |
Named decisions on this topic
Biggest dollars
Contested votes
Vote records are currently ~96% Long Beach (from scanned minutes); this is not a cross-city contestedness comparison.
Flagged for review (5)
Recovered from PDF/scanned sources; titles not fully verified. Shown for transparency.