Home / Insights / Economic Development
Economic Development
Business Improvement District activity is the dominant economic development mechanism visible across these agendas, concentrated in Los Angeles but present in Glendale and Claremont as well. Los Angeles processed annual planning reports for at least five existing property-based BIDs — Leimert Park/Crenshaw Corridor, Fashion District, Hollywood Entertainment, Historic Old Town Canoga Park, and Village at Sherman Oaks — while simultaneously advancing nine districts through establishment, renewal, or modification proceedings: Hooper Commons, Downtown Industrial, Fashion District, West Adams, Venice Beach, Century City, Westwood, Old Granada Village, and Larchmont Village. Glendale accepted its Greater Downtown Community Benefit District's 2025 annual report and 2026 budget. Claremont reviewed its Tourism BID annual report. The sheer volume of overlapping BID proceedings reflects a maturing, ongoing administrative cycle rather than a sudden policy shift.
Mega-event economic leverage is a newly prominent cross-jurisdictional theme. Los Angeles approved a motion requiring LA28 to prioritize LA businesses and adopt transparent procurement protocols, ran street banner campaigns for the 2026 FIFA World Cup across multiple council districts, and secured an NEA 'Spirit of Sports' grant tied to the FIFA tournament. Culver City received an update on its FIFA 2026 and 2028 Olympics planning and approved a World Cup screening collaboration with the Afro Village and Bahati House Sports Lab scheduled for July 19, 2026 in downtown Culver City. Alongside mega-events, film and entertainment industry protection is emerging as a distinct priority: Los Angeles moved to create an Ad Hoc Committee on Film, Entertainment, and Creative Industry, adopted a position supporting AB 2319 to protect post-production jobs, and Culver City separately approved additional temporary subsidies on film permit application fees to incentivize production activity. Long Beach contracted for an entertainment strategic plan at $565,020.
Spending patterns reveal a strong concentration in tourism infrastructure and workforce development. Los Angeles issued $85 million in qualified bonds for a downtown hotel development, the largest single commitment in this period. Long Beach executed a $4,608,676 amendment to its Visit Long Beach/Meet Long Beach tourism contract, accepted $750,000 from the U.S. Economic Development Administration, and contracted $600,000 for workforce subject matter experts and $405,500 through the Grow America Fund for small business lending. Glendale appropriated $357,000 in state CCEP grant funds for community beautification and youth employment. Culver City awarded $259,000 in special event grants. Smaller cities — Pomona, Claremont — appear at the grant-application stage. Redondo Beach's activity was almost entirely in closed-session waterfront property negotiations, with the Acting Waterfront and Economic Development Director named as agency negotiator across multiple sessions, suggesting active but undisclosed real estate positioning.
(Synthesized from the 120 most recent items.)
What to watch AI-generated
Key items (8)
- [1] CD 14 CONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF MOTION (JURADO - BLUMENFIELD) and RESOLUTION relative to issuing qualified 501(c)(3) bonds, in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $85,000,000 for an 11-story hotel located at 1130 South Hope Street. — Los Angeles, 2026-04-21 · Largest spending commitment in the set: $85M bond issuance for a downtown hotel, directly tied to hospitality capacity ahead of the 2028 Olympics.
- [38] Recommendation to authorize City Manager, or designee, to execute all documents necessary for a Second Amendment to Agreement No. 36740 with Visit Long Beach, Inc., dba Meet Long Beach, of Long Beach, CA, a California non-profit corporation, to provide the City of Long Beach (City) with a marketing program for conventions and tourism, and to support economic development initiatives that position Long Beach as a destination for entertainment, sports, and tourism, and support small businesses, in the amount of $4,608,676, for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and in amounts subject to annual appropriation by the City Council in subsequent years, for an additional three-year extension beyond the originally authorized agreement term; and authorize City Manager, or designee, to execute all documents necessary to amend the agreement, including any necessary subsequent amendments. (Citywide) — Long Beach, 2026-06-09 · $4.6M amendment to the Visit Long Beach tourism contract — the largest explicit tourism operations investment in this period across any city.
- [1] PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENT OF BALLOT TABULATION and ORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to establishment of the Hooper Commons Property and Business Improvement District (District), pursuant to Section 53753 of the California Government Code, Section 36600 et seq. of the California Streets and Highways Code and Article XIII D of the California Constitution. — Los Angeles, 2026-07-01 · Hooper Commons BID first-consideration ordinance, the furthest-advanced of the multiple BID proceedings that dominate LA's economic development calendar and the most-repeated signal in continuations.
- [11] Recommendation to adopt resolution authorizing City Manager, or designee, to execute an agreement, and any necessary documents including any subsequent amendments, with the U.S. Economic Development Administration (EDA) to receive and expend grant funding in the amount of $750,000, in support of the City's Revolving Loan Fund (RLF) Program for the period of April 1, 2026, to March 31, 2029; and Increase appropriations in the General Business Assistance Fund Group in the Economic Development and Opportunity Department by $750,000, offset by grant funding from the EDA. — Long Beach, 2026-06-16 · $750K EDA grant illustrates Long Beach's strategy of leveraging federal economic development funds; anchors a broader cluster of grant-absorption actions in the same meeting.
- [28] CONSIDERATION OF MOTION (HARRIS-DAWSON – NAZARIAN) relative to creating an Ad Hoc Committee on Film, Entertainment, and Creative Industry. — Los Angeles, 2026-05-27 · Motion to create an Ad Hoc Committee on Film, Entertainment, and Creative Industry marks the emergence of active legislative defense of LA's entertainment sector.
- [26-744] CC - ACTION ITEM: (1) Approval of a Collaboration with the Afro Village + Bahati House Sports Lab relative to the World Cup Screening in Downtown Culver City on July 19, 2026; (2) Update on the City’s 2028 Olympics Planning Efforts; and (3) Direction to the City Manager as Deemed Appropriate. — Culver City, 2026-04-27 · World Cup screening event approval and Olympics planning update show how smaller cities are converting mega-event proximity into local economic programming.
- [14] Recommendation to adopt Specifications No. RFP ED-25-612 and award a contract to Sound Diplomacy, Inc., of Wilmington, DE, for the development of an Entertainment Strategic Plan, in an amount of $125,000, authorize a 10 percent contingency in the amount of $12,500, for a total contract amount not to exceed $137,500, for a period of one year; and, authorize City Manager, or designee, to execute all documents necessary to enter into the contract, including any necessary subsequent amendments. (Citywide) — Long Beach, 2026-04-14 · $565K entertainment strategic plan contract shows Long Beach investing in long-term economic positioning beyond event-by-event opportunism.
- [53] DETERMINATION and ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND JOBS COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the Workforce Development System Program Year 2026-27 Annual Plan. — Los Angeles, 2026-07-01 · Workforce Development System Annual Plan for 2026-27 represents the recurring workforce investment thread that appears across LA, Long Beach, and Glendale in this period.
- Coverage is 10 of LA County's 88 cities today, expanding across the county — not yet a full regional census.
- We compare shares of council attention (% of substantive items), not raw counts, so a small city and a large one compare fairly. Procedural boilerplate (minutes, warrants, proclamations, appointments, presentations) is stripped first.
- Dollars are $ on items naming an amount, deduped to one figure per item — not verified award totals. "—" means no amount was extracted, never that $0 was spent.
- The ingested window differs by city, so totals aren't over identical periods.
How cities compare on economic development
Share of each city's council attention going to this topic (substantive items), and dollars per resident where amounts were extracted. We don't rank by raw counts.
| City | Attention share | $ (items) | $ / resident |
|---|---|---|---|
| Los Angeles |
9% |
$85.1M | $22.28 |
| Claremont |
8% |
— | — |
| Long Beach |
6% |
$23.0M | $49.24 |
| Redondo Beach |
5% |
$35K | $0.48 |
| Culver City |
5% |
$260K | $6.38 |
| Signal Hill |
3% |
— | — |
| Glendale |
2% |
$375K | $1.91 |
| Pomona |
2% |
$12.4M | $82.00 |
| Sierra Madre |
1% |
— | — |
| Calabasas |
0% |
— | — |
Named decisions on this topic
Biggest dollars
Contested votes
Vote records are partial — captured only where a city publishes minutes or an official council journal (chiefly Long Beach and Los Angeles); this is not a cross-city contestedness comparison.
Flagged for review (5)
Recovered from PDF/scanned sources; titles not fully verified. Shown for transparency.