Home / Insights / Economic Development
Economic Development
The dominant theme across LA County cities from May through July 2026 is Business Improvement District activity, concentrated almost entirely in Los Angeles. The City of LA initiated or renewed at least a dozen BIDs in a compressed window — Venice Beach, Century City, Westwood, West Adams, Larchmont Village, Fashion District, Hooper Commons, Hollywood Entertainment District, Old Granada Village, Wilshire Center, Historic Old Town Canoga Park, Village at Sherman Oaks, and Greater Leimert Park/Crenshaw Corridor — moving them through ordinances of intention, protest hearings, and ballot tabulations in sequence. This signals a coordinated, citywide BID consolidation cycle, not isolated neighborhood initiatives. A parallel thread runs through workforce development infrastructure: Long Beach awarded $600,000 in contracts to workforce subject matter experts (KPMG and others), entered agreements with LBUSD and Long Beach City College for internship pipelines, and accepted a $750,000 U.S. Economic Development Administration grant, while Los Angeles reconstituted its WorkSource and BusinessSource center operator networks for Program Year 2026-27 and reappointed its Workforce Development Board.
Spending patterns reveal significant scale differences between jurisdictions. Los Angeles approved $85 million in qualified bonds for a downtown hotel development — by far the largest single economic development action in this period — and issued bond funds for the San Pedro Business Façade and Gateway Sign projects. Long Beach committed $4.6 million to its tourism and conventions partnership with Visit Long Beach/Meet Long Beach, received a $2.165 million California Governor's grant, and contracted $405,500 with Grow America Fund for small business lending. Culver City allocated $259,000 in special event grants and extended film permit fee subsidies to incentivize production. Glendale accepted a $357,000 CCEP grant from Caltrans for community beautification and youth employment. Redondo Beach's economic development activity was almost entirely conducted in closed session, with at least six separate real property negotiation sessions over Fisherman's Wharf tenants — Level Up Bowl & Bistro, Quality Seafood Inc., Del Amo Motorsports, and others — suggesting active redevelopment of its waterfront retail portfolio.
Cities diverge sharply in strategy: Los Angeles relies on BID self-governance and large-scale public finance; Long Beach is building a layered workforce and grant-funded economic development infrastructure while also pursuing Main Street commercial corridor zoning reform (new MU-M and CMS zoning districts); Redondo Beach is focused on waterfront lease activation; Culver City is leveraging the 2026 FIFA World Cup and 2028 Olympics for local film and event economic benefit; and Claremont is sustaining a Tourism BID and Chamber partnership at a smaller but consistent scale. The FIFA World Cup and Olympics thread connects LA, Culver City, and Long Beach, with each city pursuing distinct strategies — LA mandating LA28 prioritize local businesses, Culver City planning a World Cup screening event and Olympics programming, and Long Beach positioned through its tourism conventions infrastructure.
(Synthesized from the 120 most recent items.)
What to watch AI-generated
Key items (8)
- [1] CD 14 CONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF MOTION (JURADO - BLUMENFIELD) and RESOLUTION relative to issuing qualified 501(c)(3) bonds, in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $85,000,000 for an 11-story hotel located at 1130 South Hope Street. — Los Angeles, 2026-04-21 · Largest single economic development action in the period: $85 million in qualified bonds for a downtown LA hotel development.
- [1] PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENT OF BALLOT TABULATION and ORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to establishment of the Hooper Commons Property and Business Improvement District (District), pursuant to Section 53753 of the California Government Code, Section 36600 et seq. of the California Streets and Highways Code and Article XIII D of the California Constitution. — Los Angeles, 2026-07-01 · Illustrates the BID wave's culmination — Hooper Commons reaches ballot tabulation and first-consideration ordinance after months of protest hearings across a dozen parallel BID formations.
- [38] Recommendation to authorize City Manager, or designee, to execute all documents necessary for a Second Amendment to Agreement No. 36740 with Visit Long Beach, Inc., dba Meet Long Beach, of Long Beach, CA, a California non-profit corporation, to provide the City of Long Beach (City) with a marketing program for conventions and tourism, and to support economic development initiatives that position Long Beach as a destination for entertainment, sports, and tourism, and support small businesses, in the amount of $4,608,676, for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and in amounts subject to annual appropriation by the City Council in subsequent years, for an additional three-year extension beyond the originally authorized agreement term; and authorize City Manager, or designee, to execute all documents necessary to amend the agreement, including any necessary subsequent amendments. (Citywide) — Long Beach, 2026-06-09 · A $4.6 million agreement with Visit Long Beach/Meet Long Beach is the largest tourism/convention investment visible in the dataset and reflects Long Beach's destination economy strategy.
- [11] Recommendation to adopt resolution authorizing City Manager, or designee, to execute an agreement, and any necessary documents including any subsequent amendments, with the U.S. Economic Development Administration (EDA) to receive and expend grant funding in the amount of $750,000, in support of the City's Revolving Loan Fund (RLF) Program for the period of April 1, 2026, to March 31, 2029; and Increase appropriations in the General Business Assistance Fund Group in the Economic Development and Opportunity Department by $750,000, offset by grant funding from the EDA. — Long Beach, 2026-06-16 · $750,000 U.S. Economic Development Administration grant, the clearest example of federal economic development dollars flowing to the region in this period.
- [10] Recommendation to adopt Specifications for RFQ ED-25-588 Workforce Subject Matter Experts and award contracts to KPMG LLP, of McLean, VA; National Collaborative for Transformative Youth Policy, of Washington, DC; Science L.E.A.F, of Riverview, FL; TPMA, LLC, of Indianapolis, IN; and WorkED Consulting, of Burke, VA to provide as-needed various workforce development services through America's Job Center of California (AJCC), in a total annual aggregate amount not to exceed $600,000, for a period of two years, with the option to renew for three additional one-year periods, at the discretion of the City Manager; and, authorize City Manager, or designee, to execute all documents necessary to enter into contracts, including any necessary amendments. — Long Beach, 2026-05-12 · $600,000 workforce subject matter expert contracts with KPMG and partners illustrate Long Beach's investment in formal workforce development infrastructure, a theme recurring across multiple meetings.
- [53] Recommendation to adopt ordinance amending Title 22.11, 22.12, 22.15, 22.30, 22.40, and 22.41 of the Long Beach Municipal Code (ZCA24-005) to establish two new zoning districts, Mixed-Use Main Street (MU-M) and Commercial Main Street (C-M) that will implement the Neighborhood Serving Corridor Low (NSC-L) and Community Commercial (CC) PlaceTypes of the Long Beach General Plan Land Use Element and minor amendments to all existing zoning districts contained within Title 22, read and adopted as read. — Long Beach, 2026-06-16 · New Mixed-Use Main Street and Commercial Main Street zoning districts represent a structural, regulatory approach to commercial corridor revitalization distinct from any other city's strategy.
- [26-0832] CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR - The Closed Session is authorized by the Government Code Section 54956.8. AGENCY NEGOTIATOR: Mike Witzansky, City Manager Elizabeth Hause, Waterfront and Community Services Director David Biggs, Project Manager Jon Goetz, Redwood Public Law PROPERTY: 123 International Boardwalk, Redondo Beach, CA 90277 (a portion of APN: 7505-002-908) NEGOTIATING PARTIES: Raman Walia, Multiverse Platforms - Level Up Bowl & Bistro UNDER NEGOTIATION: Lease Status, Price, and Terms — Redondo Beach, 2026-07-14 · One of multiple closed-session lease negotiations at Fisherman's Wharf, representing Redondo Beach's concentrated focus on waterfront commercial tenant activation as its primary economic development mode.
- [26-744] CC - ACTION ITEM: (1) Approval of a Collaboration with the Afro Village + Bahati House Sports Lab relative to the World Cup Screening in Downtown Culver City on July 19, 2026; (2) Update on the City’s 2028 Olympics Planning Efforts; and (3) Direction to the City Manager as Deemed Appropriate. — Culver City, 2026-04-27 · FIFA World Cup screening and 2028 Olympics planning update illustrates how mega-events are shaping near-term economic development decisions across multiple cities simultaneously.
- Coverage is 10 of LA County's 88 cities today, expanding across the county — not yet a full regional census.
- We compare shares of council attention (% of substantive items), not raw counts, so a small city and a large one compare fairly. Procedural boilerplate (minutes, warrants, proclamations, appointments, presentations) is stripped first.
- Dollars are $ on items naming an amount, deduped to one figure per item — not verified award totals. "—" means no amount was extracted, never that $0 was spent.
- The ingested window differs by city, so totals aren't over identical periods.
How cities compare on economic development
Share of each city's council attention going to this topic (substantive items), and dollars per resident where amounts were extracted. We don't rank by raw counts.
| City | Attention share | $ (items) | $ / resident |
|---|---|---|---|
| Los Angeles |
9% |
$85.1M | $22.28 |
| Claremont |
8% |
— | — |
| Redondo Beach |
7% |
$35K | $0.48 |
| Long Beach |
5% |
$23.6M | $50.52 |
| Culver City |
5% |
$260K | $6.38 |
| Signal Hill |
2% |
— | — |
| Glendale |
2% |
$375K | $1.91 |
| Pomona |
2% |
$12.4M | $82.00 |
| Sierra Madre |
1% |
— | — |
| Calabasas |
0% |
— | — |
Named decisions on this topic
Biggest dollars
Contested votes
Vote records are partial — captured only where a city publishes minutes or an official council journal (chiefly Long Beach and Los Angeles); this is not a cross-city contestedness comparison.
Flagged for review (5)
Recovered from PDF/scanned sources; titles not fully verified. Shown for transparency.