Home / Insights / Budget & Finance
Budget & Finance
The week's agendas span a regional budget adoption season, with Calabasas adopting its FY 2026-27 budget outright and Claremont approving a two-year operating and CIP budget, while Pomona formally closes out FY 2024-25 with an annual audit receive-and-file and reappropriates $529,304 in completed CIP project balances. Capital infrastructure dominates dollar volume: Long Beach alone is moving a $50 million highway construction services contract increase, a $13.5 million Police Department Crime Laboratory construction appropriation, $3.5 million in Convention Center and Rainbow Lagoon curb repairs, and a $6.75 million real property purchase — dwarfing the CIP amendments seen in smaller cities (Pomona's $140K fire station work, $120K boiler replacement). Across the region, landscape and lighting assessment districts are being established or amended in at least four cities — Calabasas, Claremont, Signal Hill, and Sierra Madre — a seasonal pattern coinciding with fiscal year rollovers.
Housing and homelessness funding appears across every city tier. Long Beach is accepting $5 million and $3.9 million in second-year Measure A Local Solutions grants, approving an FY 2026-27 federal action plan, and granting $200,000 to a community land trust for affordable housing. Glendale is committing $3.21 million in HUD CDBG/HOME/ESG funds through its annual action plan and reprogramming $58,000 in CDBG funds to a neighborhood playground. Pomona is adopting its own CDBG/HOME/ESG action plan. Los Angeles is issuing multifamily housing revenue bonds of $9 million and $12.1 million for two separate affordable housing developments. The scale differs sharply — Long Beach's Measure A allocation alone exceeds Glendale's entire HUD plan — but the programmatic direction is uniform.
Risk management and technology modernization represent two recurring spending categories. Long Beach is procuring $13.9 million in municipal liability and specialized insurance, $7.2 million in property and cyber liability coverage, and $822,000 in excess workers' compensation — plus authorizing multiple workers' compensation settlements. Pomona, Signal Hill, and Redondo Beach are each commissioning actuarial or impact-fee studies, signaling mid-cycle cost-recovery reviews. On the technology side, Long Beach is expanding Mobile Field Services software contracts by $2.4 million combined and committing $1.5 million to Job Order Contracting software; Pomona is amending its budget to cover new financial software; and Los Angeles is renewing a sole-source land-records database contract — a cross-city pattern of investing in field and financial operations platforms entering new fiscal years.
(Synthesized from the 120 most recent items.)
What to watch AI-generated
Key items (8)
- [46] Recommendation to authorize City Manager, or designee, to execute all documents necessary to amend Contract No. 36566 (Specifications No. R-7196) with All American Asphalt, of Corona, CA, for providing as-needed major and secondary highway construction services, to increase the annual contract amount by $50,000,000, for a revised total annual contract amount not to exceed $100,000,000. — Long Beach, 2026-06-16 · Largest single expenditure in the dataset at $50M; signals Long Beach's sustained infrastructure investment pace entering FY 2026-27
- [41] Recommendation to authorize City Manager, or designee, to execute all documents necessary to amend Contract No. 37602 with the Los Angeles County Chief Executive Office, to accept and expend second year funding in the amount of $5,023,735, for an updated contract amount not to exceed $9,889,433, for the Measure A: Local Solutions Fund from November 18, 2025 through June 30, 2031 at the discretion of the City Manager; and Increase appropriations in the Health Fund Group in the Health and Human Services Department by $5,023,735, offset by grant revenues. — Long Beach, 2026-06-16 · $5M Measure A second-year homeless grant illustrates the scale of Long Beach's homelessness funding relative to peer cities
- [2b] City Council Motion to approve FY 2026-27 CDBG, ESG, and HOME Annual Action Plan totaling $3,210,581; authorize the submission of the Annual Action Plan to U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), as recommended by the CDBG Advisory Committee and Continuum of Care (CoC) Board; and authorize the City Manager or a designee, to redirect excess, cancelled or unused program funds under $50,000 from one project to another with CDBG Advisory Committee approval — Glendale, 2026-06-09 · Glendale's $3.2M HUD action plan shows mid-sized cities deploying federal housing funds on the same cycle as Long Beach and LA
- [18] CD 6 MOTION (PADILLA - RODRIGUEZ) and RESOLUTION relative to issuing Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds, in an amount not to exceed $12,137,000 to finance the new construction of the 46-unit multifamily housing development known as Oatsie's Place (Project) located at 16015 Sherman Way in Council District Six (CD 6). — Los Angeles, 2026-06-10 · $12.1M multifamily housing bond issuance reflects LA's use of tax-exempt bond financing as its primary affordable housing production tool
- [42] Recommendation to authorize City Manager, or designee, to purchase, through Alliant Insurance Services, Inc., the following insurance policies: excess municipal liability insurance at a premium not to exceed $13,935,240, with multiple carriers; a deductible buy-down policy with Safety National to reduce the City's self-insured retention to $7.5 million at a premium not to exceed $2,411,881; Officer Involved Shooting (OIS) coverage with Lloyd's of London at a premium not to exceed $901,511; airport liability insurance with National Union Fire Insurance Company at a premium not to exceed $169,091; aircraft liability and hull insurance for Police Department helicopters with National Union Fire Insurance Company at a premium not to exceed $61,742; storage tank insurance with Liberty Surplus Insurance Corporation at a premium not to exceed $44,038; SPILLS pollution coverage with Ironshore Specialty Insurance Company at a premium not to exceed $11,529; drone coverage with Starr Indemnity & L — Long Beach, 2026-06-16 · $13.9M municipal liability insurance purchase represents the region's most visible risk-management expenditure and benchmarks insurable exposure for large cities
- [26-1416] Resolution to Amend the FY 2025-26 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Budget by Closing Completed Projects and Releasing and/or Reappropriating Unexpended Funds It is recommended that the City Council adopt the following resolution: RESOLUTION NO. 2026-63 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF POMONA, CALIFORNIA, TO AMEND THE FY 2025-26 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP) BUDGET BY CLOSING COMPLETED PROJECTS AND RELEASING AND/OR REAPPROPRIATING $529,304.28 OF UNEXPENDED FUNDS — Pomona, 2026-06-15 · CIP project close-out and $529K reappropriation illustrates the end-of-fiscal-year capital recycling common to mid-sized cities this week
- [4] Fiscal Year 2026-2027 Budget — Calabasas, 2026-06-10 · Calabasas FY 2026-27 budget adoption anchors the regional budget-season pattern visible across Claremont and Pomona as well
- [47] Recommendation to adopt Plans and Specifications No. R-7254 and award a contract to New Dynasty Construction Co., of Tustin, CA, for construction of the Long Beach Police Department Crime Laboratory TI Project, in the amount of $13,520,817, authorize a 10 percent contingency in the amount of $1,352,082, for a total contract amount not to exceed $14,872,899, at the discretion of the City Manager; and, authorize City Manager, or designee, to execute all documents necessary to enter into the contract, including any necessary subsequent amendments; and Increase appropriations in the Capital Projects Fund Group in the Public Works Department by $12,500,000, offset by future bond proceeds, to fully support Project delivery, including design, construction, and associated administration and design support costs. — Long Beach, 2026-06-16 · $13.5M crime lab construction is the largest public-safety capital commitment in the dataset and a multi-year project entering execution phase
- Coverage is 10 of LA County's 88 cities today, expanding across the county — not yet a full regional census.
- We compare shares of council attention (% of substantive items), not raw counts, so a small city and a large one compare fairly. Procedural boilerplate (minutes, warrants, proclamations, appointments, presentations) is stripped first.
- Dollars are $ on items naming an amount, deduped to one figure per item — not verified award totals. "—" means no amount was extracted, never that $0 was spent.
- The ingested window differs by city, so totals aren't over identical periods.
How cities compare on budget & finance
Share of each city's council attention going to this topic (substantive items), and dollars per resident where amounts were extracted. We don't rank by raw counts.
| City | Attention share | $ (items) | $ / resident |
|---|---|---|---|
| Signal Hill |
44% |
— | — |
| Claremont |
41% |
— | — |
| Long Beach |
38% |
$469.9M | $1006.84 |
| Sierra Madre |
38% |
$4.2M | $372.27 |
| Calabasas |
33% |
— | — |
| Pomona |
32% |
$30.9M | $203.44 |
| Culver City |
30% |
$152.8M | $3747.30 |
| Glendale |
21% |
$51.4M | $261.64 |
| Redondo Beach |
19% |
$37.0M | $517.02 |
| Los Angeles |
17% |
$535.1M | $140.06 |
Named decisions on this topic
Biggest dollars
Contested votes
Vote records are partial — captured only where a city publishes minutes or an official council journal (chiefly Long Beach and Los Angeles); this is not a cross-city contestedness comparison.
Flagged for review (5)
Recovered from PDF/scanned sources; titles not fully verified. Shown for transparency.
Cross-city precedents
Similar budget & finance actions appearing in more than one city — starting points to investigate.
Quarterly Investment Report Review — Calabasas, Claremont, Long Beach, Sierra Madre
Calabasas, Claremont, Long Beach, and Sierra Madre each periodically review their city's investment portfolio, receiving treasurer or finance staff reports on holdings and returns for the most recent fiscal quarter. AI summary
Annual Budget Study Sessions — Glendale, Sierra Madre, Signal Hill
Glendale, Sierra Madre, and Signal Hill are each holding multi-department budget study sessions, reviewing proposed spending across city departments and capital projects as part of their annual budget process. AI summary
Annual Audit Report Acceptance — Calabasas, Long Beach, Pomona
Calabasas, Long Beach, and Pomona each received and filed their Annual Comprehensive Financial Reports, fulfilling standard requirements for independent audits of city finances at the close of their respective fiscal years. AI summary
SB-1 Road Repair Project List Approval — Pomona, Redondo Beach, Signal Hill
Pomona, Redondo Beach, and Signal Hill each approved their annual list of local road improvement projects funded by California's Road Repair and Accountability Act (SB-1) for fiscal year 2026-27. AI summary
Redevelopment Successor Agency Budget Approval — Culver City, Glendale, Signal Hill
Culver City, Glendale, and Signal Hill are each approving their annual Recognized Obligation Payment Schedules (ROPS) for fiscal year 2026–27, a required step for successor agencies winding down former redevelopment agency obligations. AI summary
Mid-Year Budget Status Reviews — Glendale, Los Angeles
Glendale and Los Angeles are each reviewing their fiscal year 2025-26 financial status, with council committees examining revenue and expenditure progress at quarterly checkpoints during the budget year. AI summary
Receiving and Filing Financial Audit Reports — Long Beach, Redondo Beach
Long Beach and Redondo Beach city councils are each formally acknowledging financial reports — an audit and a treasurer's quarterly report respectively — by voting to receive and file them as part of routine fiscal oversight. AI summary
Annual Financial Report Approval — Glendale, Signal Hill
Glendale and Signal Hill are each reviewing and accepting their Annual Comprehensive Financial Report for fiscal year 2024-25, a standard end-of-year accountability process required of local governments. AI summary