Home / Insights / Budget & Finance
Budget & Finance
LA County cities are in peak FY 2026-27 budget season, with adoptions and study sessions running concurrently across the region. Los Angeles passed its annual budget resolution in late May (meeting 18241 and 18292), Pomona adopted its FY 2026-27 operating and housing authority budgets, Culver City is in active City Manager proposal review, and Sierra Madre held back-to-back full-department study sessions covering police, fire, public works, capital improvement, planning, library, finance, and city manager's office. Glendale is furthest into its capital and fee deliberations, having completed Budget Study Session #3 on CIP and fee schedule changes — and notably, the mayor has separately requested the council consider retaining a financial consultant to review the city's overall fiscal condition, a signal of fiscal stress not seen among peer cities in this dataset.
Housing finance and revenue generation are the two most active spending and policy themes. Los Angeles is issuing bonds at significant scale: $9 million for a 41-unit affordable project and $12.1 million for a 46-unit development, both on the June 10 agenda. Glendale approved a $3.21 million CDBG/ESG/HOME Annual Action Plan submission to HUD and is amending HOME-ARP allocation preferences for assisted senior units. Redondo Beach allocated $150,706 for a housing navigator and shelter operations. On the revenue side, a clear regional trend is emerging around sales taxes: Calabasas formally adopted Measure K (a voter-approved sales tax ordinance) and enacted CDTFA compliance documents; Claremont presented polling results on whether to place a local sales and use tax measure on the November 2026 ballot, with a continued item to consider doing so. Los Angeles simultaneously withdrew a business tax repeal initiative from the November ballot, protecting an existing revenue stream.
Special assessment districts — for street lighting, landscape maintenance, sewer service, and community facilities — are being renewed region-wide as a consistent, recurring financing mechanism: Los Angeles set hearings for three separate street lighting assessment districts, Signal Hill initiated its landscape and lighting maintenance district levy, Sierra Madre approved its downtown landscaping and lighting district, Culver City confirmed solid waste fees through FY 2030-31 and its sewer service charge levy, and Calabasas levied both a Community Facility District tax and landscape/lighting assessments. Capital spending at the smaller-city scale is targeted and infrastructure-focused: Sierra Madre appropriated $400,000 for water main replacement and $324,050 for aquatic center pool refurbishment in supplemental mid-year appropriations. Across the region, cities are also updating comprehensive fee schedules (Culver City, Glendale, Pomona, Signal Hill development impact fees) to align cost recovery with FY 2026-27 service levels.
(Synthesized from the 120 most recent items.)
What to watch AI-generated
Key items (8)
- [18] CD 6 MOTION (PADILLA - RODRIGUEZ) and RESOLUTION relative to issuing Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds, in an amount not to exceed $12,137,000 to finance the new construction of the 46-unit multifamily housing development known as Oatsie's Place (Project) located at 16015 Sherman Way in Council District Six (CD 6). — Los Angeles, 2026-06-10 · Largest single dollar item in the dataset — $12.1M bond issuance for 46-unit housing, illustrating LA's bond-financed housing production strategy.
- [16] CD 14 MOTION (JURADO - BLUMENFIELD) and RESOLUTION relative to issuing one or more series of bond in any aggregate principal amount not to exceed $9,000,000 (Obligations) to finance and/or refinance the acquisition, rehabilitation, improvement, renovation, furnishing and equipping of the 41-unit affordable multifamily housing development known as The Lincoln Hotel Apartments (Project) located at 549 Ceres Avenue in Council District 14. — Los Angeles, 2026-06-10 · $9M housing bond for 41-unit affordable project; paired with item 18 shows concentrated housing capital deployment on a single agenda.
- [1b] Mayor Kassakhian's Request to Agendize a Report to Consider Retaining a Financial Consultant to Review the City's Fiscal Condition — Glendale, 2026-06-02 · Mayor's request to retain a financial consultant to review Glendale's fiscal condition is the clearest signal of fiscal stress among peer cities in this period.
- [18] Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance No. 2026-422 Relating to a Transaction and Use Tax Measure (Measure K) Approved by Voters at the May 5, 2026 Special Municipal Election — Calabasas, 2026-05-27 · Formal adoption of Measure K sales tax ordinance marks the completion of a voter-approved revenue measure — the furthest-along example of the regional sales tax trend.
- Polling Results for Possible Placement of a Local Sales and Use Tax Measure on the November 2026 Ballot — Claremont, 2026-05-26 · Polling results on a possible November 2026 sales tax measure make this the most consequential pending revenue decision in the dataset, with a continued item still open.
- [2b] City Council Motion to approve FY 2026-27 CDBG, ESG, and HOME Annual Action Plan totaling $3,210,581; authorize the submission of the Annual Action Plan to U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), as recommended by the CDBG Advisory Committee and Continuum of Care (CoC) Board; and authorize the City Manager or a designee, to redirect excess, cancelled or unused program funds under $50,000 from one project to another with CDBG Advisory Committee approval — Glendale, 2026-06-02 · $3.21M CDBG/ESG/HOME Annual Action Plan shows federal housing program scale at the mid-tier city level, with concurrent Housing Authority mirror action.
- [9C] Resolution No. 26-38 Authorizing a Supplemental Budget Appropriation from the Water Fund Reserve in the amount of $400,000 and Approval of the Water Main Replacement Agreement with Toll West Coast, LLC — Sierra Madre, 2026-05-26 · $400k supplemental water main appropriation illustrates how smaller cities fund urgent infrastructure outside the normal budget cycle.
- [26-914] CC:SA:HA:PA - ACTION ITEM: (1) Discussion of the City Manager's/Executive Director's Proposed Budget for Fiscal Year 2026-2027; and (2) Direction to the City Manager as Deemed Appropriate. — Culver City, 2026-05-26 · Active City Manager budget discussion with council direction represents a city still mid-deliberation, contrasting with cities that have already adopted.
- Coverage is 10 of LA County's 88 cities today, expanding across the county — not yet a full regional census.
- We compare shares of council attention (% of substantive items), not raw counts, so a small city and a large one compare fairly. Procedural boilerplate (minutes, warrants, proclamations, appointments, presentations) is stripped first.
- Dollars are $ on items naming an amount, deduped to one figure per item — not verified award totals. "—" means no amount was extracted, never that $0 was spent.
- The ingested window differs by city, so totals aren't over identical periods.
How cities compare on budget & finance
Share of each city's council attention going to this topic (substantive items), and dollars per resident where amounts were extracted. We don't rank by raw counts.
| City | Attention share | $ (items) | $ / resident |
|---|---|---|---|
| Signal Hill |
46% |
— | — |
| Sierra Madre |
39% |
$4.2M | $372.27 |
| Long Beach |
38% |
$328.5M | $703.82 |
| Claremont |
37% |
— | — |
| Calabasas |
32% |
— | — |
| Culver City |
29% |
$104.6M | $2565.15 |
| Pomona |
26% |
$29.2M | $192.16 |
| Glendale |
19% |
$44.0M | $223.90 |
| Los Angeles |
17% |
$535.1M | $140.06 |
| Redondo Beach |
17% |
$36.5M | $510.55 |
Named decisions on this topic
Biggest dollars
Contested votes
Vote records are currently ~96% Long Beach (from scanned minutes); this is not a cross-city contestedness comparison.
Flagged for review (5)
Recovered from PDF/scanned sources; titles not fully verified. Shown for transparency.
Cross-city precedents
Similar budget & finance actions appearing in more than one city — starting points to investigate.
Quarterly Investment Report Review — Calabasas, Claremont, Long Beach, Sierra Madre
Calabasas, Claremont, Long Beach, and Sierra Madre each presented routine quarterly reports on their public investment portfolios, giving councils a periodic snapshot of how city funds are invested and performing. AI summary
Redevelopment Successor Agency Budget Approval — Culver City, Glendale, Signal Hill
Culver City, Glendale, and Signal Hill are each approving their annual Recognized Obligation Payment Schedules (ROPS) for fiscal year 2026–27, a required step for successor agencies winding down former redevelopment agency obligations. AI summary
SB1 Road Repair Project Lists Approved — Glendale, Pomona, Signal Hill
Glendale, Pomona, and Signal Hill are each submitting their required annual project lists for state SB1 funding, identifying local road repair and infrastructure improvements slated for Fiscal Year 2026-27 under California's Road Repair and Accountability Act. AI summary
Annual Budget Study Sessions — Sierra Madre, Signal Hill
Sierra Madre and Signal Hill are each holding budget study sessions in which city departments present spending plans and financial priorities to the council for review and deliberation ahead of budget adoption. AI summary
Mid-Year Budget Status Reviews — Glendale, Los Angeles
Glendale and Los Angeles are each reviewing their fiscal year 2025-26 financial status, with council committees examining revenue and expenditure progress at quarterly checkpoints during the budget year. AI summary
Mid-Year Budget Review 2025-26 — Calabasas, Claremont
Calabasas and Claremont are each conducting mid-year reviews of their fiscal year 2025-26 budgets, assessing revenues and expenditures at the halfway point to inform any needed adjustments. AI summary
Annual Financial Report Approval — Glendale, Signal Hill
Glendale and Signal Hill are each reviewing and accepting their Annual Comprehensive Financial Report for fiscal year 2024-25, a standard end-of-year accountability process required of local governments. AI summary
Development Impact Fees Annual Report — Glendale, Signal Hill
Glendale and Signal Hill are each presenting their annual reports on development impact fees, reviewing how fee revenues were collected and used to fund public infrastructure improvements linked to new construction. AI summary