Home / Insights / Budget & Finance
Budget & Finance
All nine cities in this dataset are simultaneously in the final stretch of FY 2026-27 budget adoption, a compressed late-May/early-June cycle typical of California's fiscal year close. Sierra Madre ran the most intensive process—back-to-back departmental study sessions on May 27–28 covering every city function from Police and Fire through the Library and City Manager's Office. Glendale held three numbered budget study sessions culminating in a capital improvement plan and fee schedule review. Redondo Beach received its proposed budget in May and set a June 2 public hearing. Pomona moved directly to full budget adoption. Culver City held a May 26 action item for council direction on the city manager's proposed budget. This synchronized activity, combined with multiple supplemental appropriations approved mid-cycle (Sierra Madre: $400k water main, $324k aquatic center, $80k library), signals that several cities entered the season with unresolved infrastructure and service gaps.
Fee and rate adjustments are the dominant cross-city theme heading into the new fiscal year. Culver City held public hearings on a comprehensive citywide fee schedule, a parks and recreation fee update, and a five-year solid waste fee confirmation covering FY 2026/27 through 2030/31. Pomona conducted annual service fee updates. Glendale's budget study sessions included citywide fee schedule changes. Signal Hill formally studied development impact fees. On the revenue side, two cities are pursuing or implementing local sales taxes: Calabasas enacted Measure K—a voter-approved sales tax ordinance—at its May 27 meeting and adopted CDTFA compliance documents to implement collection. Claremont is weighing a parallel November 2026 ballot measure, with polling results presented to council in May as a precursor to a placement decision. This dual signal suggests that fee-for-service recovery alone is insufficient for some smaller cities, and local tax ballot measures are becoming a structurally common response.
At the project level, the largest discrete spending visible in this period is Glendale's $3.21M FY 2026-27 HUD grant deployment (CDBG, ESG, and HOME), including amendments to 2020-21 and 2025-26 plans and a HOME-ARP amendment governing senior housing selection at Parkview Glendale. Long Beach's agenda concentrated on contracts and grants across public safety ($805k fire equipment), environmental maintenance ($600k wetlands), transit ($1.587M CalDept agreement), and insurance brokerage ($525k). Sierra Madre committed $364k for a five-year animal shelter contract with Pasadena Humane and $111k for grant research services, both reflecting a small-city model of outsourcing specialized functions. Redondo Beach approved a $432.9k engineering contract amendment for street and corridor projects and allocated $150.7k for a housing navigator and shelter operations. A notable outlier is Glendale Mayor Kassakhian's request to retain a financial consultant to independently review the city's fiscal condition—an unusual item in a budget season, suggesting concern that goes beyond routine appropriations.
(Synthesized from the 120 most recent items.)
What to watch AI-generated
Key items (8)
- [2b] City Council Motion to approve FY 2026-27 CDBG, ESG, and HOME Annual Action Plan totaling $3,210,581; authorize the submission of the Annual Action Plan to U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), as recommended by the CDBG Advisory Committee and Continuum of Care (CoC) Board; and authorize the City Manager or a designee, to redirect excess, cancelled or unused program funds under $50,000 from one project to another with CDBG Advisory Committee approval — Glendale, 2026-06-02 · Largest single housing-related dollar amount in the dataset—$3.21M in federal HUD grants (CDBG/ESG/HOME) for FY 2026-27, illustrating Glendale's reliance on federal pass-through funds for community development.
- [1b] Mayor Kassakhian's Request to Agendize a Report to Consider Retaining a Financial Consultant to Review the City's Fiscal Condition — Glendale, 2026-06-02 · Mayor's request for an independent financial consultant review is an anomalous fiscal-stress signal during an otherwise routine budget season and may flag structural problems not visible in individual line items.
- [18] Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance No. 2026-422 Relating to a Transaction and Use Tax Measure (Measure K) Approved by Voters at the May 5, 2026 Special Municipal Election — Calabasas, 2026-05-27 · Formal enactment of voter-approved Measure K sales tax ordinance represents a completed local revenue solution and a contrast to cities still studying or polling on similar measures.
- Polling Results for Possible Placement of a Local Sales and Use Tax Measure on the November 2026 Ballot — Claremont, 2026-05-26 · Polling results for a possible November 2026 sales tax measure are the upstream decision point for a structural revenue change; the outcome will shape Claremont's 2026-28 budget trajectory.
- [26-914] CC:SA:HA:PA - ACTION ITEM: (1) Discussion of the City Manager's/Executive Director's Proposed Budget for Fiscal Year 2026-2027; and (2) Direction to the City Manager as Deemed Appropriate. — Culver City, 2026-05-26 · Joint CC/SA/HA/PA budget action item with direction from council is the central budget decision for Culver City, covering all four governmental entities simultaneously.
- [26-802] CC - PUBLIC HEARING: Adoption of a Resolution Confirming the Levy and Collection of Solid Waste Fees for Fiscal Years 2026/2027 through 2030/2031. — Culver City, 2026-05-26 · Five-year solid waste fee confirmation (FY 2026/27–2030/31) exemplifies the multi-year rate-setting trend seen across Culver City, Redondo Beach, and Glendale—locking in fee structures well beyond the current budget year.
- [9C] Resolution No. 26-38 Authorizing a Supplemental Budget Appropriation from the Water Fund Reserve in the amount of $400,000 and Approval of the Water Main Replacement Agreement with Toll West Coast, LLC — Sierra Madre, 2026-05-26 · $400k supplemental water main appropriation mid-cycle illustrates infrastructure deferral catching up in small cities; paired with the $324k aquatic center and $80k library supplementals, it shows a pattern of unbudgeted capital needs.
- [8] 26-55091 Recommendation to adopt resolution authorizing City Manager, or designee, to execute a contract, and any necessary documents including any necessary subsequent amendments, with Great West Fire & Safety, Inc., of Ridgefield, WA, for furnishing and delivering firefighter turnouts to the Long Beach Fire Department, in a total annual contract amount not to exceed $805,000, for a period of three years, with the option to renew for two additional one-year periods, at the discretion of the City Manager. (Citywide) — Long Beach, 2026-05-19 · $805k fire equipment contract is the largest discrete capital outlay in Long Beach's May 19 agenda and typifies the city's contract-heavy spending model across public safety, environment, and infrastructure.
- Coverage is 9 of LA County's 88 cities today, expanding across the county — not yet a full regional census.
- We compare shares of council attention (% of substantive items), not raw counts, so a small city and a large one compare fairly. Procedural boilerplate (minutes, warrants, proclamations, appointments, presentations) is stripped first.
- Dollars are $ on items naming an amount, deduped to one figure per item — not verified award totals. "—" means no amount was extracted, never that $0 was spent.
- The ingested window differs by city, so totals aren't over identical periods.
How cities compare on budget & finance
Share of each city's council attention going to this topic (substantive items), and dollars per resident where amounts were extracted. We don't rank by raw counts.
| City | Attention share | $ (items) | $ / resident |
|---|---|---|---|
| Signal Hill |
46% |
— | — |
| Sierra Madre |
39% |
$4.2M | $372.27 |
| Long Beach |
38% |
$328.5M | $703.82 |
| Claremont |
37% |
— | — |
| Calabasas |
32% |
— | — |
| Culver City |
29% |
$104.6M | $2565.15 |
| Pomona |
26% |
$29.2M | $192.16 |
| Glendale |
19% |
$44.0M | $223.90 |
| Redondo Beach |
17% |
$36.5M | $510.55 |
Named decisions on this topic
Biggest dollars
Contested votes
Vote records are currently ~96% Long Beach (from scanned minutes); this is not a cross-city contestedness comparison.
Flagged for review (5)
Recovered from PDF/scanned sources; titles not fully verified. Shown for transparency.
Cross-city precedents
Similar budget & finance actions appearing in more than one city — starting points to investigate.
Quarterly Investment Report Review — Calabasas, Claremont, Long Beach, Sierra Madre
Calabasas, Claremont, Long Beach, and Sierra Madre each presented routine quarterly reports on their public investment portfolios, giving councils a periodic snapshot of how city funds are invested and performing. AI summary
Redevelopment Successor Agency Budget Approval — Culver City, Glendale, Signal Hill
Culver City, Glendale, and Signal Hill are each approving their annual Recognized Obligation Payment Schedules (ROPS) for fiscal year 2026–27, a required step for successor agencies winding down former redevelopment agency obligations. AI summary
SB1 Road Repair Project Lists Approved — Glendale, Pomona, Signal Hill
Glendale, Pomona, and Signal Hill are each submitting their required annual project lists for state SB1 funding, identifying local road repair and infrastructure improvements slated for Fiscal Year 2026-27 under California's Road Repair and Accountability Act. AI summary
Annual Budget Study Sessions — Sierra Madre, Signal Hill
Sierra Madre and Signal Hill are each holding budget study sessions in which city departments present spending plans and financial priorities to the council for review and deliberation ahead of budget adoption. AI summary
Mid-Year Budget Review 2025-26 — Calabasas, Claremont
Calabasas and Claremont are each conducting mid-year reviews of their fiscal year 2025-26 budgets, assessing revenues and expenditures at the halfway point to inform any needed adjustments. AI summary
Development Impact Fees Annual Report — Glendale, Signal Hill
Glendale and Signal Hill are each presenting their annual reports on development impact fees, reviewing how fee revenues were collected and used to fund public infrastructure improvements linked to new construction. AI summary
Annual Financial Report Approval — Glendale, Signal Hill
Glendale and Signal Hill are each reviewing and accepting their Annual Comprehensive Financial Report for fiscal year 2024-25, a standard end-of-year accountability process required of local governments. AI summary
Annual Financial Audit Report Acceptance — Calabasas, Long Beach
Calabasas and Long Beach are each receiving and filing their Annual Comprehensive Financial Reports (ACFRs) for fiscal year 2025, a standard transparency process where cities present independently audited financial statements to their councils. AI summary